Multi-Congregational Pastors...What Does It Take to Be One?

“ After I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the Throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands and they cried in a loud voice.....Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the Throne and the Lamb”. (Revelation 7:9 – 10).

From his vantage point on the Island of Patmos, the Apostle John peered into the future and saw people from every nation, every tribe, people and language. There were so many of them that they simply couldn’t be counted.

How did all these people make it into John’s vision? Well, somebody delivered the Word to them! How shall they hear unless someone be sent?
so we sent missionaries all over the world, and new names are still being written into the Book of Life because of their efforts. However, many of the peoples to whom we went, have now landed on our shores and wave after wave of immigrants have arrived and have become assimilated into our cities, towns and villages therefore:

The implication for us as pastors and leaders is obvious.
We have a role to play that nobody else can play!
We have a job to do that nobody else can do!
We have a ministry to fulfil that nobody else can fulfill!


We must embrace those who have been “given to us” and those who have been “placed in our care”.
The Apostle John’s vision is clear, can you see it ? but more importantly can you be a part of making it happen ?
My guess is that you can indeed see this great vision, but my guess also is that you may not have a handle on how to make it happen. Perhaps the following guidelines may be of some help.

When Dr. Jerry Porter was Superintendent of the Washington District, the following Multi–Congregational Model material was prepared.

Phase One: (Ministry or Preaching Point)


1. The ministry to the new ethnic group is either a department ministry of the church or a preaching point supervised by the church.

2. The leader of the ethnic ministry is either a staff member or the “shepherd” for the group.

3. A steering committee is elected among the members of the new ministry group.

4. Separate bookkeeping systems are established for the new preaching point.

5. The new preaching point covers its own expenses with occasional donations from the sponsoring church.

6. The sponsoring church board determines, in consultation with the ministry committee, the space available, hours and guidelines for new ministries.


Phase Two: (Ministry or Church Type Mission).


1. The group is recognized as a Church Type Mission with a pastor, leaders and a functioning church board.

2. Stewardship responsibilities are emphasized among the members of the ethnic ministry or Church Type Mission.

3. The sponsoring church and district are “partners in ministry”, working with the Church Type Mission.

4. The District Multi-Cultural coordinator and the sponsoring pastor work closely with the new Church Type Mission.

5. Church officers and a church board are elected among the Church Type Mission. Once every three months, there is a joint board meeting for communication between the Church Type Mission and the sponsoring church.

6. At least once every three months, there is a combined worship service.

 


Phase Three: (Organized Church).


1. The Church Type Mission requests authorization to be a fully organized church as a branch of the “whole”.

2. Both churches are equals, sharing a building and a mission.

3. A “Multi-Congregational Board” is elected for the whole congregation.

4. Facility use and rental expenses are determined by the “Multi-Congregational Board”.

5. There are quarterly joint worship/fellowship activities between congregations.


Possible Weaknesses Of This Model.

1. Dominance of the “majority” group.

2. Unclear sense of “ownsership”

3. Double Input: District and Multi Congregational Board.

4. Mother church loses its original constituency ministry.


SPECIAL NOTE: Since I used the above material as a direct quote from Dr Porter and the work of the Washington District, I did not feel at liberty to make any changes. However it would be more appropriate to change usage of CHURCH TYPE MISSION to NEW START. This would be in keeping with the description now used by the denomination consistent with Jim Dorsey’s department. (Ian).

Your Role as Pastor